Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Food security policy assessment in the Punjab, Pakistan: effectiveness, distortions and their perceptions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to assess the impact of short-term policies on smallholder farmers’ household food security. It answers three key questions: What is the impact of selected policies on farmers’ household food security? What would have been the impact of these policies if implemented perfectly? Are the perceived impacts of food security policies in line with their estimated impacts? For this purpose, a conceptual model is proposed using a partial equilibrium model approach. The model identifies policy impact pathways. Two demand side policies (food subsidy and minimum wage rate) and two supply side policies (wheat support price and urea subsidy) are assessed. Results show that one of each improves farmers’ household food security. Furthermore, these policies are poorly implemented and consequently their potential benefits are much reduced. The comparison of farmers’ perceptions and their estimated monetary gains shows notable divergence. This study suggests that more research is warranted into the potential of food security policies, as much of their effectiveness is lost due to poor implementation. It also suggests that, for the Punjab, policies emphasising wheat support prices better address food insecurity than urea subsidies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. see for reference www.usc.com.pk

  2. 1 Rs. = $ 0.0105483

References

  • Ahmed, A.U., Bouis, H.E., Gutner, T., & Löfgren, H. (2001). The Egyptian food subsidy system: structure, performance, and options for reform. Research Report 119, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

  • Aikaeli, J. (2010). Determinants of rural income in Tanzania: An empirical approach. Research Report 10/4, Dar es Salaam, REPOA.

  • AIOU. (2001). Food composition table for Pakistan. Islamabad: Allama Iqbal Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akpan, E.O. (2009). Oil resource management and food insecurity in Nigeria. Paper presented at the European Report on Development (ERD) Conference in Accra, Ghana.

  • Amaza, P.S., Umeh, J.C., Helsen, J., & Adejobi, A.O. (2006). Determinants and measurement of food insecurity in Nigeria: some empirical policy guide. Presented at international association of agricultural economists annual meeting, August 12–18, Queensland, Australia, online available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/25357/1/pp060591.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  • Amaza, P.S., Abdoulaye, T., Kwaghe, P., & Tegbaru, A. (2009). Changes in household food security and poverty status in PROSAB area of Southern Borno State, Nigeria. Promoting Sustainable Agriculture in Borno State (PROSAB), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA).

  • Anana, E., & Nique, W. (2010). Perception-based analysis: an innovative approach for brand positioning assessment. Journal of Database Marketing and Customer Strategy Management, 17, 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babatunde, R. O., Omotesho, O. A., & Sholotan, O. S. (2007). Socio-economic characteristics and food security status of farming households in Kwara State, North-Central Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 6, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, A. P. (1992). Wheat price policy in Pakistan: a welfare economics approach. The Pakistan Development Review, 31, 1145–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S. T. (1999). Food security and food self-sufficiency in Africa II. Food Security Situation and Related Constraints. Philadelphia: African Studies Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B. (2002). Food security and food assistance programs. In B. Gardner & G. Rausser (Eds.), Chapter 40, Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Volume 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, M. K., & Azeem, M. M. (2008). Agricultural credit in Pakistan: constraints and options. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 6, 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, M. K., & Azeem, M. M. (2009). A comparative analysis of loanee and non loanee farmers. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 7, 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, M. K., & Schilizzi, S. (2012). Have policies in Pakistan been effective for improving food security? Wanted: disaggregated policy assessment! World Applied Sciences Journal, 17, 1182–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, M. K., & Schilizzi, S. (2013). Determinants of rural household food security: a comparison of African and Asian studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93, 1251–1258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, M. K., Schilizzi, S. & Mohammad, S. (2014). Do demand side policies improve the landless rural households? Investigating Pakistan’s achievements in the Punjab. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 24(5), 1554–1564.

  • Bashir, M. K., Bajwa, Z. N., Bakhsh, K., Maqbool, A., & Chattha, M. W. A. (2007). Food security perspectives in Pakistan. Proceedings of the International Conference on Productivity and Growth in Agriculture: Strategies and Interventions (p. 150). Faisalabad: University of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, M. K., Amin, A., & Naeem, M. K. (2010a). Micro-credit and poverty alleviation in Pakistan. World Applied Sciences Journal, 8, 1381–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, M. K., Naeem, M. K., & Niazi, S. A. K. (2010b). Rural and peri-urban food security: a case of district Faisalabad of Pakistan. World Applied Sciences Journal, 9, 403–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, M. K., Schilizzi, S., & Pandit, R. (2012). The determinants of rural household food security in the Punjab, Pakistan: an econometric analysis, Working Paper 1203. Crawley: School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghin, J. C., Bureau, J. C., & Park, S. J. (2003). Food security and agricultural protection in South Korea. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 618–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouis, H., & Hunt, J. (1999). Linking food and nutrition security: past lessons and future opportunities. Asian Development Review, 17, 168–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellaraj, G., Brorsen, B. W., & Farris, P. L. (1992). Effects of subsidized wheat consumption by state in India. Agricultural Economics, 7, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorosh, P., & Minten, B. (2005). Rice price stabilization in Madagascar: Price and welfare implications of variable tariffs. SAGA Working Paper, USAID.

  • Dorosh, P., & Salam, A. (2006). Wheat markets and price stabilisation in Pakistan: An analysis of policy options. PIDE working papers, 2006:5. Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edirisinghe, E. (1987). The food stamp scheme in Srilanka: costs, benefits and options for modifications. Research Report no. 58. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewens, W. J., & Grant, G. R. (2001). Statistical methods in bioinformatics. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2004). FAO statistics. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistic Division, Socio-Economic Statistics and Analysis Service.

  • FAO. (2009). Crop prospects and food situation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistics Division, Socio-Economic Statistics and Analysis Service. Online available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/ai484e/ai484e04.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  • FAO. (2011). Country rank in the World, by commodity. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Statistics Division.

  • FAO. (2014). The state of food insecurity in the world: Strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayeye, T. R., & Ola, D. J. (2007). Strategies for food security and health improvement in the Sub-Saharan Africa. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3, 808–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feleke, S., Kilmer, R. L., & Gladwin, C. (2005). Determinants of food security in Southern Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 33, 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEWS, N. E. T. (2011). Nigeria food security outlook. Famine Early Warning Systems Network. Washington, D.C.: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gera, N. (2004). Food security under structural adjustment in Pakistan. Asian Survey, 44, 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, E. (1998). The wheat pricing policies in Pakistan: some alternative options. The Pakistan Development Review, 37, 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujrati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2008). Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill /Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen, C., & Gruber, J. (2001). The dynamic determinants of food insufficiency. Second Food Security Measurement and Research Conference / FANRR, Economic Research Services, USDA.

  • Gyawali, S., & Ekasingh, B. (2008). Livelihood and food security assessment of Tharu Ethnic People, Dang District, Nepal. In the Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Agricultural Systems “Agriculture for Community and Environment to Prepare for Global Warming” 27–28 May 2008 at The Empress Hotel, Chiang Mai. pp 295–304.

  • Haddad, L., Kennedy, E., & Sullivan, J. (1994). Choice of indicators for food security and nutrition monitoring. Food Policy, 19, 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. W. (1985). Partial vs. general equilibrium analysis and choice of functional form: implications for policy modelling. Journal of Policy Modelling, 7, 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque, A. (1993). Allocative efficiency and input subsidy in Asian agriculture. The Pakistan Development Review, 32, 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibekwe, U. C., Eze, C. C., Onyemauwa, C. S., Henri-Ukoha, A., Korie, O. C., & Nwaiwu, I. U. (2010). Determinants of farm and off-farm income among farm households in south east Nigeira. Academia Arena, 2, 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iroghama, I. P. (2011). Public perceptions of government’s effectiveness in handling corruption in Nigeria. Business and Economics Journal, 21, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S.J., & Frongillo, E.A. (2006). The modifying effects of food stamp program participation on the relation between food insecurity and weight change in women. The Journal of Nutrition, 1091–1094.

  • Kaiser, L. L., Quiñonez, H. M., Townsend, M., Nicholson, Y., Fujii, M. L., Martin, A. C., & Lamp, C. L. (2003). Food insecurity and food supplies in Latino households with young children. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behaviour, 35, 148–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kebebew, Z., & Urgessa, K. (2011). Agroforestry perspective in land use pattern and farmers coping strategy: experience from southwestern Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7, 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellens, W., Zaalberg, R., Neutens, T., Vanneuville, W., & Maeyer, P.D. (2011). An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian coast. Risk Analysis, 31.

  • Khan, N. P. (2002). Government’s interventions in Pakistan’s wheat and cotton sectors: concepts, policies and implications. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 1, 492–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khasnobis, B.G., & Hazarika, P.D. (2006). Women’s status and children’s food security in Pakistan. Discussion Paper No. 2006/03, World Institute for development Economics Research, UN University.

  • Klein, R., & Vella, F. (2009). A semi-parametric model for binary response and continuous outcomes under index heteroskedasticity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24, 735–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn, J., & McMillan, M. (2004). Does food aid harm the poor? household evidence from Ethiopia. NBER Working Paper 11048.

  • Lindert, K., & Vincensini, V. (2010). Social policy, perceptions and the press: an analysis of the media’s treatment of conditional cash transfers in Brazil. Social Protection Discussion Paper. The World Bank.

  • Lorenzana, P.A., & Sanjur, D. (1999). Abbreviated measures of food sufficiency validly estimate the food security level of poor households: measuring household food security. The Journal of Nutrition, 687–692.

  • Lund, J. F., Balooni, K., & Puri, L. (2010). Perception-based methods to evaluate conservation impact in forests managed through popular participation. Ecology and Society, 15, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, D. (1995). Alternative food security strategy: a household analysis of urban agriculture in Kampala. World Development, 23, 1669–1681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, D. (1996). Measuring food insecurity: the frequency and severity of coping strategies. Food Policy, 21, 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S., & Frankenberger, T. (1992). Household food security: Concepts, indicators, measurements: A technical review. Rome: IFAD/UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCalla, A.F., & Revoredo, C.L. (2001). Prospects for global food security: A critical appraisal of past projections and predictions. 2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture, and the Environment Discussion Paper 35. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

  • McCloud, N., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2008). Do subsidies drive productivity? A cross-country analysis of Nordic dairy farms. Advances in Econometrics, 23, 245–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mhango, J., & Dick, J. (2010). Analysis of fertilizer subsidy programs and ecosystem services in Malawi. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 1–8.

  • Miller, J. C., & Coble, K. H. (2006). Cheap food policy: fact or rhetoric? Food Policy, 32, 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misselhorn, A. A. (2005). What drives food insecurity in Southern Africa? A meta-analysis of household economy studies. Global Environmental Change, 15, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, J. J. (1999). Sound policies for food security: the role of culture and social organization. Review of Agricultural Economics, 21, 489–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngwenya, E. (2007). Adherence to the USDA food guide pyramid and determinants of household food group choice in Vietnam. Paper presented at the 36th Australian Conference of Economists, of the Economic Society of Australia, 24–26 September 2007, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

  • NSSO. (1995). Measurement of poverty in Sri Lanka. National Sample Survey Organization of India.

  • Ojogho, O. (2010). Determinants of food insecurity among arable farmers in Edo State. Nigerian Agricultural Journal, 5, 151–156.

  • O’Toole, R., & Matthews, A. (2002). General equilibrium, partial equilibrium and the partial derivative: Elasticities in a CGE model. Paper presented to the International Conference on Global Modeling, EcoMod2002, Brussels, July 4th to 6th.

  • Onyeiwu, S., & Liu, J. (2011). Determinants of income poverty in rural Africa: Empirical evidence from Kenya and Nigeria. Paper Presented at the African Economic Conference, Addis Ababa, October 26–28.

  • Oriola, E. O. (2009). A framework for food security and poverty reduction in Nigeria. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 132–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 194–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peyrot, M. (1996). Causal analysis: theory and application. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 21, 3–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal, D., Sexton, S., Hochman, G., Roland-Holst, D., & Zilberman, D. (2009). Model estimates food-versus-biofuel trade-off. California Agriculture, 63, 199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, J. M. (1989). Agricultural supply response: a survey. Agricultural Economics, 3, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. (2002). Assessing the impact of food policy research: rice trade policies in Viet Nam. Food Policy, 27, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleth, R. M., & Dinar, A. (2009). The impact of multiple policy interventions on food security. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31, 923–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, U.A., Llull, C., & Havlík, P. (2008). Bioenergy and food security modelling income effects in a partial equilibrium model. Presented at 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists.

  • Scott, A. (2010). assessing public perception of landscape: from practice to policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5, 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, F.M. (2007). Determinants of household food security and consumption pattern in rural Sindh: an application of non-separable agricultural household model. Presented at the I Mediterranean Conference of Agro-Food Social Scientists. 103rd EAAE Seminar ‘Adding Value to the Agro-Food Supply Chain in the Future Euromediterranean Space’. Barcelona, Spain.

  • Shatalebi, B., & Shamsi, A. (2012). An investigation of the effective factors in increasing the quality of instruction in technical schools workshops from the view point of students and teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sindhu, R. S., Kaur, I., & Vatta, K. (2008). Food and nutritional insecurity and its determinants in food surplus areas: the case study of Punjab state. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 21, 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, J. (1982). Determinants of food consumption in rural Sierra Leone: application of the quadratic expenditure system to the consumption-leisure component of a household-firm model. Journal of Development Economics, 11, 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, G.J. (2007). An economic analysis of exclusion restrictions for instrumental variable estimation. Discussion Paper No. 2585, The Institute of Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany, online available at http://ftp.iza.org/dp2585.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2013.

  • Verpoorten, M. (2001). Imperfect markets: a case study in Senegal. Discussions Paper Series (DPS) 01.20. Center for Economic Studies, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.

  • Wegner, A., Moore, S. A., & Bailey, J. (2004). Consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment in Western Australia: practitioner perceptions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Khalid Bashir.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Food Composition Table (AIOU 2001)

Amount in 100 g of edible portion

Name of Food

kcal

Name of Food

kcal

Corn Whole grain flour

276

Apple

57

Rice Polished Fried

268

Banana Ripe

96

Vermicelli

345

Dates Dried

293

Wheat Whole grain flour

357

Dates Fresh

131

Wheat flour Granular

370

Guava Whole

73

Wheat Bread

369

Lemon

30

Wheat Bread

259

Lichi

62

Wheat Bread

364

Mango Ripe

64

Wheat Bread

293

Melon Water

23

Wheat Bread

263

Mandarin

44

Wheat Flour

440

Orange Sweet

43

Broad Bean Cooked

175

Peach

47

Chickpea Cooked

187

Pomegranate

66

Lentil Cooked

178

Zizyphus

79

Mung Bean Cooked

120

Butter Milk

31

Mash Cooked

158

Curd

52

Bath Sponge

18

Cream

361

Bottle Gourd

15

Milk Buffalo Fluid Whole

105

Bringal

26

Milk Cow Fluid Whole

66

Cauliflower

27

Milk Goat Fluid Whole

70

Cucumber

16

Yogurt

71

Lady Finger

35

Ice-cream

148

Spinach

27

Beef

244

Tinda

23

Buffalo Meat

123

Carrots

37

Chicken Meat

187

Onion

44

Goat Meat

164

Potato

83

Sheep Meat

175

Reddish

23

Chicken Egg White

400

Turnip

26

Duck Egg White (Raw)

895

Cumin Seed

336

Butter

721

Liquorice Root

212

Ghee

874

Clove

304

Ghee (Buffalo)

900

Turmeric

365

Lard (Raw)

899

Pepper Black

268

Dalda (Hydrogenated Oil)

892

Corn Oil

900

Jaleebe

395

Soybean

887

Koa (Whole Buffalo Milk)

401

Sugar

380

Halwa Sohen

481

Gur

310

Carbonated Beverages Pepsi, Coke, etc.

39

Honey

310

Lemon Juice

43

Barfi

384

Mango Juice

74

Appendix 2

Adult equivalent units by current study

Age groups (years)

Male

Female

<1

0.43

0.43

1–3

0.54

0.54

4–6

0.72

0.72

7–9

0.87

0.87

10–12

1.03

0.93

13–15

0.97

0.80

16–19

1.02

0.75

20–39

1.00

0.71

40–49

0.95

0.68

50–59

0.90

0.64

60–69

0.80

0.51

70+

0.70

0.50

Source: NSSO 1995

Appendix 3

Descriptive Statistics

Continuous variables

Min

Max

Mean

Std. D

Calorie intake-Cal i (Kcal/AE/Day)

612

4989

3193

809

Gains from wheat support price-wSub i (Rs)

0

495 ($ 5)

171 ($ 2)

156

Gains from urea subsidy-uSub i (Rs.)

0

375 ($ 4)

62 ($0.65)

73

Monthly income-MI i (Rs.)

2193 ($ 23)

56,217 ($593)

19,485 ($206)

9729

Household heads’ age-HHHA i (Years)

22

76

46

10

Family size-fSize i (Numbers)

1

25

7

3

Total earning members-Tear i (Numbers)

1

5

1

1

Land holdings-LH i (Acres)

1

5

4

1

livestock large animals-LSA (L)i (Numbers)

0

26

6

4

livestock small animal-LSA (S)i (Numbers)

0

8

3

1

Household distribution by household heads’ education levels

Education levels

Illiterate

Primary

Middle

Intermediate

Graduation

Number of households

96 (17 %)

195 (34 %)

80 (14 %)

158 (27 %)

47 (8 %)

Household distribution by getting food subsidy

 

Received

Did not receive

Number of households

356 (62 %)

220 (38 %)

Household distribution by off-farm work

 

Worked

Did not work

Number of households

480 (83 %)

96 (17 %)

Household distribution by receiving minimum wage

 

Received

Did not receive

Number of households

342 (71 %)

138 (29 %)

Household distribution by decision making

 

Females

Males

Number of households

174 (30 %)

402 (70 %)

Household distribution by family structure

 

Nuclear

Joint

Number of households

348 (60 %)

228 (40 %)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bashir, M.K., Schilizzi, S. Food security policy assessment in the Punjab, Pakistan: effectiveness, distortions and their perceptions. Food Sec. 7, 1071–1089 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0489-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0489-y

Keywords

Navigation